CFO Outlook 2026 — Northern Europe

Survey of 150 senior finance leaders (CFOs, Finance Directors and Heads of Credit) across Denmark, Norway, Sweden and Germany, conducted April 2026.

View data for
Based on 150 finance leaders across four markets
About this data

Figures are percentages of finance leaders in each market, rounded to the nearest whole number. Per-market samples are small (Denmark 31, Norway 47, Sweden 32, Germany 40), so differences from the regional average are indicative and should be read as directional. Compare each market to the Northern European average rather than to another single market.

Fieldwork: April 2026

Top priorities for the finance function (next 12–18 months)

Respondents chose up to three. Figures show the share selecting each, so they do not total 100%.

Cash flow & working capital
Northern Europe avg
55%
Risk management
Northern Europe avg
61%
Cost control
Northern Europe avg
29%
Automation & efficiency
Northern Europe avg
48%
Data & forecasting
Northern Europe avg
48%
Compliance & regulation
Northern Europe avg
40%
Strategic business partnering
Northern Europe avg
14%

Confidence in managing financial risk over the next 12 months

Single choice on a 1–5 scale. Figures total 100%.

96%
Confident (4–5)
Northern Europe
1 — Not confident
Northern Europe avg
0%
2
Northern Europe avg
0%
3
Northern Europe avg
4%
4
Northern Europe avg
39%
5 — Very confident
Northern Europe avg
57%

How would you describe your current credit and collections setup?

Single choice. Figures total 100%.

67%
Largely automated or fully integrated (4–5)
Northern Europe
Fully manual
Northern Europe avg
6%
Mostly manual
Northern Europe avg
15%
Partly automated
Northern Europe avg
11%
Largely automated
Northern Europe avg
39%
Fully integrated & data-driven
Northern Europe avg
29%

How important is improving working capital and cash conversion?

Single choice on a 1–5 scale. Figures total 100%.

98%
Important (4–5)
Northern Europe
1 — Not important
Northern Europe avg
0%
2
Northern Europe avg
0%
3
Northern Europe avg
2%
4
Northern Europe avg
41%
5 — Very important
Northern Europe avg
57%

How would you describe your current use of AI in the finance function?

Single choice. Figures total 100%.

94%
In operational use (limited or embedded)
Northern Europe
Not using AI
Northern Europe avg
0%
Exploring / piloting
Northern Europe avg
6%
Limited operational use
Northern Europe avg
44%
Embedded in key processes
Northern Europe avg
50%

Biggest challenges to AI implementation in finance

Multiple choices allowed. Figures show the share citing each, so they do not total 100%.

Cost & unclear ROI
Northern Europe avg
55%
Skills & capability gaps
Northern Europe avg
50%
Governance, risk & compliance
Northern Europe avg
45%
Data & systems challenges
Northern Europe avg
40%
Cultural resistance & change management
Northern Europe avg
35%
Strategy & execution barriers
Northern Europe avg
16%

Where could AI deliver the most value in credit management?

Respondents chose up to two. Figures show the share selecting each, so they do not total 100%.

Customer segmentation
Northern Europe avg
61%
Risk prediction
Northern Europe avg
49%
Credit decisioning
Northern Europe avg
37%
Collections prioritisation
Northern Europe avg
36%
Forecasting & reporting
Northern Europe avg
14%

Which capabilities would you consider paying for in the next 12–18 months?

Multiple choices allowed. Figures show the share selecting each, so they do not total 100%.

Real-time dashboards
Northern Europe avg
64%
Predictive risk insights
Northern Europe avg
59%
Automated collections workflows
Northern Europe avg
54%
AI-driven credit scoring
Northern Europe avg
47%
Cross-market consistency & compliance
Northern Europe avg
25%

Most important factor when evaluating a new solution (ranked first)

Share ranking each factor as their single most important. Totals approximately 100%.

ROI
Northern Europe avg
31%
Transparency & control
Northern Europe avg
34%
Ease of integration
Northern Europe avg
18%
Compliance
Northern Europe avg
10%
Scalability
Northern Europe avg
7%